Posts from — October 2005
Happy Holidays
I’ve been listening to my fvorite Halloween music band, the Misfits, and I thought I would offer these holiday sentiments from them.
HALLOWEEN
bonfires burning bright pumpkin faces in the night i remember halloween dead cats hanging from poles little dead are out in droves i remember halloween brown leaved vertigo where skeletal life is known i remember halloween this day anything goes burning bodies hanging from poles i remember halloween halloween, halloween, halloween, halloween candy apples and razor blades little dead are soon in graves i remember halloween this day anything goes burning bodies hanging from poles i remember halloween, halloween, halloween, halloween halloween, halloween, halloween, halloween
October 31, 2005 No Comments
Happy Halloween
Since I must indulge in pagan rituals on this hallowed evening, (good thing I don’t live in the Commiewealth of Taxachussets) there’s still time to ask a DUmmy. You will have until Tuesday afternoon, and I should have the answers by sometime Tuesday night. I don’t know the permalink, and I can’t acces it through work here. It’s the next item down on the main page here. Damn websense. I’m just gald I can send submissions through email. Don’t forget to ask a DUmmy, and Happy halloween.
October 31, 2005 No Comments
I’m Still Right
Sometimes we all wish something would have been seen by more people, and sometimes were just too lazy to write something new. Either way. Here’s some thing I’m bringing back from the past. Originally published on Wednesday, June 08, 2005.
Using The Right Words: Illegal Immigration
Howard Dean’s recent comment, “two Republican congressmen, Jim Sensenbrenner and Tom Tancredo have incredible anti-immigrant legislation,” got me thinking. Of course there is the obvious response that the legislation is against illegal immigration, not legal immigration, but the problem here is that the Left sets the language of the debate here. Why do we call people who don’t belong here immigrants if they are here illegally?
When someone is invited to one’s own home they are a guest. By the same token, the term immigrant carries the connotation of someone who migrated from one country to another by legal means. A sense that they are invited to come or allowed to come is inherent to the word, just as it is with a guest.
Conversely, if someone unlawfully enters one’s home, they are not a guest, are they? No. They are intruders. They are trespassers. They have committed the act of breaking and entering. Why would we call trespassers and intruders the international equivalent of guests? We should call illegal “immigrants” what they are – illegal intruders, or illegal trespassers, who have unlawfully broken and entered our country.
How far could a Leftist get arguing that we should not allow illegal intruders into the country? But a Leftist would call the intruder an immigrant, and drop the illegal portion, thus making us sound mean not to allow politely invited guests into our homeland. This is not the case of course, but one of the keys to winning an argument is using the right words.
The Democrats are experts at manipulating the language, but the Republicans are not too keen on this area yet. Time after time the President and fellow Republicans are trying to persuade the American public using the Democrats terms, instead of more favorable terms, thus making their arguments seem contradictory. For example, why should we crack down on guest workers, or tighten restrictions on undocumented workers? We shouldn’t, but even the President, is using those words to describe people who enter our homeland unlawfully. Now lets rephrase the question. Should we crack down on unlawful trespassers, or tighten restrictions on illegal intruders? Of course we should!
Let’s use the right words to frame the issue.
Linked on Stop the ACLU, Point Five, Wizbang
October 29, 2005 No Comments

