Are you gonna tell us a dick joke, Chris? Make sure it’s a good one. I haven’t heard any good jokes in a while, so nearly all of my amusement comes in the form of Les’ photoshop skills.

“What about all the other idiots who read these stupid blogs and actually believe it. ”

I think a quote from the XM radio jocks Opie and Anthony is very fitting here: “You don’t go to CNN for dick jokes; don’t come here for hard hitting journalism.”

Satire vs. the News?

First of all we’re talking about a book, not the news.

No it took me about 15 minutes to write that.

Been baited? You think i could care at all about being “trapped”

Lastly, as satirical as it may be, writing such nonsense about such an important issue is only pushing us in the wrong direction. So you think you’re all intelligent making behind the curtain jokes? What about all the other idiots who read these stupid blogs and actually believe it.

How can you argue about something and have no motives to progress in either direction?

Insulting my readership? Is it really an insult to correct a hideous attempt at satire about the most ridiculously NOT FUNNY problem we are facing. I guess it’s good someone attempts to make light of such a sad example of man’s stubbornness.

Its one thing to be satirical of a political figure, another of the global catastrophic time-bomb that is climate change.

Wow Clay that was a 770-word response.

How long did it take you to write that, or did you copy-and-paste from some moonbat website?

Thanks Angie. You said it all.

It’s like I’ve observed before, these types can’t tell the difference between satire and the news. To them it’s the same thing. No wonder when they feed on the MSM. They’re starving to death on the empty lines and content devoid drivel that’s spoon fed to them by those who call themselves journalist, but in fact are mimics for the fascist, Nanny Staters.

There, that ought to cause a bit of a fuss. I’d be willing to bet Clay can’t even tell he’s been baited. Any takers?

Hey, Clay?

POT, MEET KETTLE.

Dude, I totally got through like 3 lines of the friggin book you wrote up there. Intelligent speaking (or writing) also includes being concise – oh, and not insulting your readership.

Duh.

*Yet another leftist wiener who does NOT understand the meaning of SATIRE….

Leave a comment or the terrorists win. You think you’re joking, but the more i read your writing the more i realize youre on of those people that buys in to all the bullshit. Enough said. Say something intelligent, i dare you.

To author:

Do you know how ignorant and dumb you sound?

Global Climate Change has nothing to do with “believing.” How can you even try to argue 99% of the scientists on the planet? While there’s no doubt it can be difficult to be taught science by a political figure, there is NO ARGUMENT against global warming. Ya its still cold, you just don’t even understand what he means by warming. A few degrees warmer to most of us sounds pretty awesome, until all the ecosystems we rely on to live begin to break down.

I wish the people who don’t “believe” in global warming would all put their money where their mouth is and see how funny it is when we’re all continuing to live peacefully with the planet and you’re all stuck trying to power your inefficient AC units with all the gas you bought and started storing in your garage when everyone started to switch over to actually intelligent forms of energy.

If you were smart and read with any kind of open mind, you would learn that not only would a mass shift towards sustainability create millions of jobs and help ensure our future, efficiency makes everything cheaper! For you too! You are basically arguing for the sake of being stubborn, and the only thing you have to gain is lower quality air and water, higher energy prices, and wishing in 50 years you had taken that trip to Patagonia to see the glaciers that will soon seize to exist.

You’re ignorant because it’s easier to write about other people who you can bash because you know they won’t come at you when they have way more legitimate issues to deal with.

And hippies? As a relatively open-minded and whole-hearted person, so i think, and one who according to your definition of hippies is in no way fighting technology exportation, “i am a mech engineer student,” the hippies sound WAY smarter than you! Bad music? Well that’s a good judgement of intelligence, when half of the fucking collegiate population listens to tween bopping retard tech-boosted girls, thats hardly an argument. The drugs? Like the “elite” members of society haven’t developed a greater need for pill popping to deal with the most REDICULOUS illnesses. Though i no longer smoke it other than on occasion, marijuana has had a million times better effects on the population when compared to tobacco or alcohol. The sex part? Maybe you just need to get some?

You’re trying to argue with science. PROVEN SCIENCE. Why don’t you argue with gravity or something a little simpler to wrap your mind around. The hippies figured this our LONG before our technology did; the concept that we have to care for our earth, because here is what you completely fail to understand:

99.9999% (that is an exact rounded factual statistic) of all species to ever exist on earth, have eventually gone extinct. Its not about protecting the environment. Its about using it in a way that will allow us to continue to live! The earth will continue to exist LONG after we are gone. The way we live now is proven a completely unsustainable way.

I’ll give you a quick breakdown. you can bash it or whatever you want, but if you read it maybe something will click in your head and you’ll realize how ignorant youve been.

Until the industrial revolution, world population never exceeded 1 million. Since then, its grown 6 fold. We discovered evergy that had been stored by the sun millions of years ago. Until that point, the sun itself was the only energy we had to grow our food and survive. The world was in balance, and human population was at a sustainable level. Once we discovered fossil fuels, we developed with an advantage over every other organism on this planet: not having to rely solely on the sun for energy. This created an unnatural balance. Now, more people are hungry than ever before, more diseases exist than ever before, and the air we breathe is dirtier. If you want to have to live with all robotic parts to be able to survive on this planet than thats fine for you, but i like being human.

You have no argument other than the fact that you don’t like gore. Why don’t you write a book about it if you actually care as much as your sadistic comments seem to reflect. Instead of deleting this post, why dont you try to refute a single thing ive said and try to form a real argument. You’re the pussy, hiding from actual knowledge.

[...] is the reason for his latest need for profit as he shills out another self-righteous, ego-inflating book on global warming: I know Al Gore likes to think of himself as the smartest man alive, and the media likes to gargle [...]

.00025, hmm, is it a coincidence that this is the same persentage of CO2 that human activity has added to the atmosphere in the last 400 years, or so? Oh wait, it should be HALF THAT.