Political Humor | Anti-War Dementia Reaches Logical Conclusion

Political Humor Satire Parody News Editorials Conservative Politics Radioactive Liberty

Anti-War Dementia Reaches Logical Conclusion

January 30th, 2007 by Fiar · 6 Comments ·

FIAR bannerSome time ago, I issued a challenge to trolls (Cached version, scroll down some). I asked the Chickenchickenpussies that like to refer to us as Chickenhawks why it was necessary for me to enlist to attempt to prevent the demonization of our soldiers. I asked why I needed to become a soldier in order to keep America-Hating, Treasonous, Unpatriotic, Worthless, Marxist, “Anti-War,” Useless, Excrement Belching Traitors from smearing our military with relentless attacks against their integrity. Why must I serve in order to defend the honor of those who defend our way of life?

I said “Tell me why I should sit idly by and allow my friends to return home to be spat upon, shat upon, humiliated, denigrated, ridiculed, ostracized, exiled and forgotten, simply for having the courage to fight to defend our civilization, our way of life, and our country.”

Eventually, some putrid carcasses of despicable bile took up the challenge. FM’s blog got nuked, but you can view a cached version of the whole thread. Troll Challenge Part 2. I don’t feel like scouring the comments, but at one point one parasitic ghoul seemed to suggest that I had a non-argument because none of the troops were being spit upon.

Well, Via the Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler:

We’re sure you remember CPL Joshua Sparling who, while recovering at Walter Reed, received one of those lovely sentiments that the “Troop-Supporting” Loony Left are so justly infamous for. In CPL Sparling’s case, it was the wish that he’d die rather than recover.

Well, CPL Sparling stubbornly refused to die, even though he did lose his leg defending the right of assnuggets like the postcard writer to wish death upon him.

He also went to the Mall to protest the protesters the other day and the “tolerant”, “troop-supporting” Left promptly rewarded this amputee veteran by spitting at him.

So, how’s that for a strawman argument then, you worthless socialist swine? I knew it would happen sooner or later. It’s the natural result of non-stop coverage of our guys “abusing detainees” and “Murdering civilians,” none of which actually even happened.

In conclusion; Congratulations, Maggots! Your relentless smear campaign has reached it’s logical and predicted conclusion. I hope you choke to death on your own vomit.

Tags: Politics [Yawn] ·

6 responses so far ↓

  • 1 RT - Chief Mongress // Jan 30, 2007 at 10:40 pm

    AWESOME POST!!!!

  • 2 fmragtops // Jan 30, 2007 at 11:42 pm

    I think Phil said it best when said Re-Spect.

  • 3 RT - Chief Mongress // Jan 30, 2007 at 11:58 pm

    “You talkin’ to me? No way PUNK!”

  • 4 richj // Jan 31, 2007 at 1:33 pm

    And since the story is in the NY Times, the official paper of record, the moonbats will have a hard time denying it, but they will anyway.

  • 5 Diesel // Jan 31, 2007 at 4:26 pm

    FIAR - To be fair, for every soldier that was spat upon, there are probably hundreds who only received postcards wishing for their death.

  • 6 Skul // Jan 31, 2007 at 5:49 pm

    I rather liked the “chickenchickenpussy” thing.
    Ought to be trademarked and copywrited or something.
    Are they edible?

Leave a Comment or the Terrorists Win!