Dammit! Fmragtops gets back from his surveying of Alaska – he was determining where we could best launch a strike against Siberian Russia in the War for Oil when he becomes President – and the first comment he leaves, he tries to blow the whole scheme. Here we are, concocting a war, and he wants to ruin the whole conspiracy.

On my post about Why I Support a War for Oil, he leaves this comment:

I prefer war for oil because of it’s violent, and chaotic nature, but more energy for us is a good reason too.

Well, duh! You seem to forget, FM, that we can’t just say that. In order to rally public support for a war, we need to present the American people with justifications that sound rational. The joy we receive from the severed bodies of children is the real reason for war, but we need to keep that on the down low, if you know what I mean.

It’s like when Bush said all that stuff about spreading democracy, and genocide, WMDs, “no fly zones,” UN resolutions, “Cease fire agreements,” tyranny, and “gathering threats” that were “not yet imminent.” Those sound like good reasons to the general public, and as such, the people start to feel supportive of a war effort.

We get off on the charred remains of innocent babies, but we need to put forth a facade that there are legitimate reasons for war. It’s about dead babies. It’s about the children, and watching their innocence torn from them in horror. It’s about burning villages to the ground, raping the livestock, and slaughtering the women, or something like that, but we need to mislead the people into thinking it’s not about having fun, it’s about making the world a better place.

*snickers* Yeah, right. Woo hoo! Dead babies.

So, FM, next time, be more careful with your words. We don’t want the retards on the Left getting wind of our true intentions.

Category: Caustic Sarcasm