This week’s flame war parody is going to pick up where we inadvertently already started one on the Gore Blames Humans for Myanmar Cyclone thread.
But who can help it? That’s the sort of thing that happens when you just don’t take yourself too seriously.
It began when I asked which was tastier, the babies or the wild animals. Daniel pointed out that the babies are tender like veal, and the wild animals are tough and gamey. Then Les James jumped in with the suggestion of stuffing the baby in the wild animal. David finished up this week’s suggestion with this:
This is on a path to a new turducken. These things do work best in 3’s…..what to do…
Now, just in case you don’t know, a turducken is a chicken stuffed into a duck stuffed into a turkey, and cooked up into a delightful triple poultry powermeal.
So, finally, after the longest introduction ever: What’s the recipe for the “new turducken?”
Discuss.
Humor-Blogs.com visitors helped start this discussion, and hopefully they’ll help finish it.
2004–2008
8 responses so far ↓
1
Wyatt Earp
// May 11, 2008 at 3:44 pm
Two parts turds, one part David Hasselhoff.
2
RT
// May 11, 2008 at 9:22 pm
Wouldn’t that make it three parts turd?
I’m still thinking about this one.
3
Chris C.
// May 11, 2008 at 11:14 pm
I still wonder how in the hell someone came up with a turducken in the first place.
4
april
// May 12, 2008 at 8:31 am
for some reason i get a little leary when it comes to shoving other livestock into the ass of another…poor turkey
5
Fiar
// May 12, 2008 at 9:12 am
RT is correct and I vote for a baby in a pig in a bison. The BisPigBy. Mmm.
6
ctdad
// May 12, 2008 at 2:46 pm
Well, I was going to suggest a baby wrapped in Bison steaks, stuffed into a peacock, but “babicock” just sounds so wrong. . . . .
7
Chris C.
// May 13, 2008 at 12:39 pm
The Chili’s ad campaign a few years ago would have taken on a whole new meaning…
I want my baby back baby back ribs….
8
Fiar
// May 13, 2008 at 2:04 pm
You mean that’s not what it meant?
Leave a Comment or the Terrorists Win!