Gays – ‘eHarmony Can Stick it up the…’
Ron Coleman points out a story that “eHarmony has been sued for running its business pursuant to its own moral — or business — compass:
The popular online dating service eHarmony was sued on Thursday for refusing to offer its services to gays, lesbians and bisexuals.
A lawsuit alleging discrimination based on sexual orientation was filed in Los Angeles Superior Court on behalf of Linda Carlson, who was denied access to eHarmony because she is gay.
This is an outrage! How dare eHarmony find a target market and market themselves to it? It’s just disgusting that they don’t provide their promise of matching on “29 dimensions of compatibility” to men seeking the ultimate car and women seeking the perfect pair of shoes.
Oh, sure, eHarmony says their not equipped to do such a thing. What do they think they exist for? To turn a profit or something?
No, they exist to give any person whatever it is that person demands. I want my compatibility for the computer of my dreams!
The way eHarmony is acting, you’d think that it was like someone could just take their business elsewhere, or if they were feeling particularly adventurous, start up their own service strictly for the gay community.
I feel sick. Humor-Blogs.com has the cure.
Category: Pointless Nonsense
2004–2012
Like or Dislike:
0 
1
“stupid faggots, e-harmony is for hetros!”
Like or Dislike:
0 
1
Stupid turd burglars.
Like or Dislike:
0 
1
Heh, Ssssteve said F2g.
Like or Dislike:
0 
1
I thought it was pretty common knowledge that E-Harmony was a primarily Christian site. Obviously they’re not going to promote homosexuality. She has no basis for her suit. It would be one thing if they refused to hire her because of her sexual orientation, but refusing to provide a dating service with them? Psh.
Like or Dislike:
0 
1
“The way eHarmony is acting, you’d think that it was like someone could just take their business elsewhere, or if they were feeling particularly adventurous, start up their own service strictly for the gay community.”
Isn’t that what gay bars and gay bingo are for?
Like or Dislike:
0 
1
What do they need to go to eHarmony for? They can just go to Craig’s List and find other freaks of nature just like themselves…
Like or Dislike:
0 
1
Them damn F 2.0′s might have to use AOL to hook up.
Like or Dislike:
0 
1
The aclu will probably get involved and sneak them in the back-door.
What would they call their “dating” site?
E-Butt??
Like or Dislike:
0 
1
What would they call their “dating” site?
Cum Guzzlers and Carpet Munchers. Hmm, that’s kind of a long name.
Like or Dislike:
0 
1
Heh, Skul said “in the back-door”
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
I GIVE HEAD
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Radioactive liberty brings the closet faggot Christians out of the woodwork…
RL posts a blog entry complaining about how a stupid woman who happens to be a lesbian is outraged that some crypto-fundie won’t allow homosexual or lesbian matchmaking on his Jesus freak matchmakers website. Granted, the woman had every right to be upset, but attempting to pressure homophobic bigots to cater to you seems counter-productive, and indeed, psychotic. (If they at least advertised themselves as a conservative-Christian dating site, that would be different, but eHarmony commercials present their site as a secular, general-purpose service. That is very disingenuous, but if they came out as a Christer site, that would be different.)
eHarmony is not for (openly) gay and lesbian people. It’s for closet-faggot (and closet-dyke) red state Christian types who are too gay to approach members of the opposite sex in person but who live in communities where they can’t come out. So they need a website to MAKE THE MATCH FOR THEM and live in hiding.
Closet-faggot conservative types like “Sssteve” (a mincing queer who even lisps when he types!), Skul, Wild Bill, and, the Queen of Conserva-faggots, Mr. FIAR of Radioactive Liberty. (What’s “radioactive” referring to? The type of jizm FIAR secretly yearns for?) Or like Ms. “kate,” obviously your typical right-wing spinster hag, a lonely frigid dyke like Ann Coulter or Laura Ingraham, who has the audacity to call them freaks of nature.
I don’t know why Sssteve [sic], FIAR, or Wild “Buffalo” Bill consider this non-story newsworthy. Certainly their sophmoric attempts at jokes and kate’s projections all serve to help them cope with their own latent desires and struggles.
Personally, I am not gay, but I just don’t see the fuss one way or the other. I think you will find that the overwhelming majority of straight guys like gay guys because they substract from the competition. It’s just the closet faggots of a conservative-religious bent who have the issues and who feel the need to intervene in others’ lives.
For the record, I think the party bringing the suit is in the WRONG. What she should do is kick off a grassroots boycott. Tell all her friends; any homosexual, bisexual, or lesbian people, or straight people who are NOT homophobic religious nuts, that she knows not to pay for an overpriced Christer service. That is the right thing to do. A lawsuit is frivolous.
And for the record, the libertarian in me says that e-Harmony has every right to discriminate so long as they are a private organization. I suppose they can say “we don’t do matchmaking for homos and dykes, and we usually won’t match niggers with whites!” What I personally find disgusting and unethical is the fact that eHarmony is so dishonest about their organization.
P.S. It is obvious that “FIAR” is a semi-literate hillbilly buffoon who confuses “their” and “they’re.”
Like or Dislike:
0 
1
The overwhelming majority of straight men would also not use so many gay sex references when ranting about a dating website. They would not, for example fantasize about what kind of semen a male writer would enjoy.
Perhaps Bubba you should spend more time exploring your own sexuality instead of worrying about what a humor blog wrote four years ago. Not sure if you noticed the 2007 publish date.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
“The overwhelming majority of straight men would also not use so many gay sex references when ranting about a dating website.”
Says who? People who are secure and know who/what they are and can joke about such things. But funny, Mr. “Chris C” does not offer the same suggestion to any of the above posters who use proportionately more “gay sex references.”
“They would not, for example fantasize about what kind of semen a male writer would enjoy.”
Who is fantasizing? Maybe you’re the one projecting. “Radioactive” can only mean so many things, and in this case “FRIAR” brings it on himself, practically bragging about how he yearns for a radioactive bukake…
“Perhaps Bubba you should spend more time exploring your own sexuality…”
Speak for yourself! It is obvious that the mincing, lisping queer Sssteve [sic], Skulfuck, Wild [Buffalo] Bill, and FRIAR himself, the queen of radioactive cum, are typical closet-faggot Republicans in the mold of Ted Haggard or Larry Craig, and that kate is a frigid old dyke in the mold of countless suspicously unmarried and childless Republihags. With you, Chris C, I am more on the fence. You don’t seem to advertise it as blatantly as Sssteve, Skulfuck, or FRIAR, but the fact that you (a) seem to have an infatuation with the blogger almost like you are in love with him (to the extent that you must defend his pathetically moronic attempt at “humor” from, in your own words, a 2007 publish date), and (b) are probably projecting your own subconscious feelings on ME, strongly suggest otherwise…
“…wrote four years ago. Not sure if you noticed the 2007 publish date.”
Again speak for yourself. Not even Sssteve or Skulfuck are rushing to the defense of this blog.