[...] One of my long time friends FIAR has condemned me for my post about Jordan Edmund. I feel so bad, I Condemn You Wild Bill! [...]

[...] Radioactive Liberty and Fmragtops Condemns Wild Bill 8 Oct 2006 One of my long time friends FIAR has condemned me for my post about Jordan Edmund. I feel so bad, I Condemn You Wild Bill! [...]

FIAR, I condemn you for condemning me. I condemn people that don’t understand your condemnation of me. Fmragtops you are jealous of my traffic mongering ways so I condemn you also. While I am at it I condemn Matt Drudge for linking to my site so everyone could read the truth. I condemn the truth. How dare someone tell the truth! I’ll talk to you later truth mongerererer.

I’m so happy I know the back story now…

Wild Bill has PROVEN that Foley is innocent.
18 years old is NOT a boy.
21 years old is NOT a boy.
FOLEY IS THE VICTIM OF PRANKS!
Tell sell out BITCH MICHELE MALKIN to get off her ass and help get Foley BACK IN OFFICE and publicly APOLOGIZE TO WILD BILL!!!!!!!

writemalkin@gmail.com

You inhuman bastards.

This whole he said she said is probably gonna go deeper.

Now we have one of our own fighting in Iraq coming up and saying he was approached by Foley while being a page.

Tough to dismiss this one.

How can anyone take a blog seriously that acts so childish like responding to a commenter and changing their handle from Barfly to Douchefly. Huh? Are you all teenagers?

I sent this to Mr. Kerr; feel free to publish it:

I read the email from the attorney.

His client is now what is known under the law as a “semi-public” personality, if in fact not a “public personality,” given the scope of the story, the breadth of its dissemination, and the fact that his client is employed as a political operative in an active campaign for the governorship.

Unless the subject’s attorney can demonstrate that you published “with a reckless disregard for the truth” in a “malicious manner,” he can go pound sand. If the IM scammer thinks this is the best legal representation he can get, he’s cooked.

I thought the most foolish part of his email had to do with premising you must have someone’s “authorization” to run his client’s name or photograph. The guy is a campaign staffer, and this is legitimate news affecting the campaign with which he is associated.

He appears publicly in connection with the campaign as a matter of his employment; does this attorney think news organizations around the world have to either get his client’s permission to have his image in a photo, or else brush stroke the guy out if they don’t? What a maroon.

Well, I guess you have to give the attorney 2 points for trying to bluff you into submission. While he is suggesting you seek an attorney familiar with civil and criminal liability, he may want to contact an attorney himself to stop having a “fool for a client” when considering exactly what you will be able to subpoena and depose if a civil suit is filed – multiplied infinitely if a criminal investigation began. There are no Fifth Amendment claims in a civil suit. Ask OJ Simpson.

To sum up what I would tell the attorney threatening me with civil and criminal liability: “Oh Br’er Fox – please don’t throw me into that briar patch . . .”

All the remarks I’ve made are my personal opinion, and in no way should be constructed to reflect the opinion of the publications for which I write. Feel free to publish this if it will get the attorney to stop making a national fool of himself.

Kenneth E. Lamb

Program Host for
“CyberSmart! Saturday” ™
“Your Turn”
“Link to Life” ™ hurricane expert

Blogs authored by Kenneth E. Lamb / blogger profile listed at:
http://www.blogger.com/profile/14444338

email: mailto:kenneth@kennethelamb.com
web: http://www.kennethelamb.com
bio:

Dang it! Stupid liberals made Wild Bill take down his comment sections. Now I don’t get to read the crazy moonbat reactions.

I hate dirty hippies.