I know my readers are learned and intelligent enough to understand the point of caustic sarcasm, but it seems that some pseudo-intellectuals lack the cognitive functioning to discern between absurd stereotypes and mockery. One meth addict says:
If any of those wingnuts are reading, here’s a cut-out-and-keep guide: it’s not satire if your actual viewpoint is simply a milder version of the one you profess to hold.
Ah, but it is satire if you are exploiting a ridiculous stereotype held by mentally deficient political adversaries. The whole point is that you retards claim us to be fascist, hate mongering, war mongering, racist, bigoted, homophobic, Islamophobic, jack-booted, right wing death beasts. The character I portray ridicules such notions by using the type of rhetoric one would use if those pathetic, ludicrous stereotypes were true.
The point is to demonstrate beyond all reasonable doubt that my beliefs are not a “milder version” of those expressed, but are, instead, nothing remotely resembling them. It was your job to recognize that. You failed. The fact that such an attempt falls flat on your feverish inability to exercise critical thinking just proves to sentient beings how brain dead you idiots really are.
You are the joke, and we’re laughing our asses off at you. Thanks for the encouragement. Please do try to develop an intelligence greater than that of a dead ringworm.
2004–2008
25 responses so far ↓
1
richj
// Dec 19, 2006 at 2:00 pm
Ha! Stupid libtards.
2
fmragtops
// Dec 19, 2006 at 2:02 pm
I tried to leave this comment there, but I doubt it gets past moderation:
“Dang! You people are stupid.”
Since I tried to leave it there, obviously “you people” means those people.
BTW, did you read any of that gooberish faux-intellectualism being vomited by that goofy leftarded chick that was ripping frankj because Cpt. Ed compared that editorial to Swift? Someone needs to set those people on fire.
3
jt
// Dec 19, 2006 at 2:52 pm
That site was the stupidest thing I have ever read…and I’ve read some pretty stupid stuff before too…
4 Fmragtops Spews » Blog Archive » Stupid Liberals Don’t Understand Satire // Dec 19, 2006 at 3:49 pm
[...] Ever since Ed Morrissey compared Frankj to Jonathon Swift, the mouth-breathing pseudo-intellectuals have been debating what is, and what is not satire. The only thing that they have settled is that liberals have absolutely no clue when it comes to satire. [...]
5
spacemonkey
// Dec 19, 2006 at 4:34 pm
I tagged you, weirdo.
6
Skul
// Dec 19, 2006 at 5:39 pm
They put ‘er up there Fm. Yes they are.
Dang, I think some of those moonbats were dropped on their head after birth.
Do spacemonkeys eat Bacon?
7
RT - Chief Mongress
// Dec 19, 2006 at 9:24 pm
Stupid, stupid, stupid, stupid, idiotic, literal morons!!!
Ugh.
8
RT - Chief Mongress
// Dec 19, 2006 at 9:25 pm
Oh and your post is written really well! Oh…I’m not grading your essay. You’d get an A, btw.
9
RT - Chief Mongress
// Dec 19, 2006 at 9:32 pm
Sorry to comment-monger..I just went to the site. FM…your comment is there and they are stupid!
I really like one of the last comments stating that “Modest Proposal” is commenting on the “tough love” solutions of the time…duh! It was about the plight of the Irish in their struggles against “outsiders” (English) and the inability to feed their families…thus, “let’s eat the little buggers.” I, of course, didn’t go into every little bit of the satire Mr. Swift composed, but I’m not trying to fly my Engish major in anyone’s face, either.
But damn…they are stupid. Now, I’m going to go finish my literal rump roast and go kill so little kids. There’s too many of them, they’re expenseive, and their toys cost to much. We don’t need them.
10
RT - Chief Mongress
// Dec 19, 2006 at 9:34 pm
(Bad grammar and spelling used as a stylistic “thing.”)
11
Ginger Yellow
// Dec 20, 2006 at 7:41 am
“Ah, but it is satire if you are exploiting a ridiculous stereotype held by mentally deficient political adversaries. The whole point is that you retards claim us to be fascist, hate mongering, war mongering, racist, bigoted, homophobic, Islamophobic, jack-booted, right wing death beasts. The character I portray ridicules such notions by using the type of rhetoric one would use if those pathetic, ludicrous stereotypes were true.”
That might just work if countless right wing pundits, bloggers and commenters hadn’t suggested nuking parts of or the entire Middle East, which would, you know, involve killing lots of Arab kids.
12
jt
// Dec 20, 2006 at 8:59 am
Not if they quit using them as human shields…
13
FIAR
// Dec 20, 2006 at 9:15 am
Ginger said, “Your ssessment that we view you people as deranged, psychotic, eliminationist, exterminationist, genocidal, fascist, hate mongering, war mongering, racist, bigoted, homophobic, Islamophobic, jack-booted, right wing death beasts is entirely accurate.
Bravo. Keep up the good work.”
14
fmragtops
// Dec 20, 2006 at 10:08 am
Here’s the part of this debate that is really starting to piss me off. These fucking douchebastic libtards are trying to debate the war by debating what’s satire. Liberals can’t be upfront about anything!
15
richj
// Dec 20, 2006 at 11:55 am
Can we nuke the entire middle east now and kill all the Arab children? I need something to do this weekend.
16
Troy Van Dellen
// Dec 20, 2006 at 12:24 pm
I dont really like sarcasm, people should just say what the mean
17
von
// Dec 20, 2006 at 2:31 pm
Sick.
Really fucking sick.
18
fmragtops
// Dec 20, 2006 at 4:40 pm
No blowhole?
19
von
// Dec 21, 2006 at 12:01 pm
BLOWHOLE!1! I tried to leave a comment last night, but apparently they don’t like me or something because it just disappeared…Stupid..
20
von
// Dec 21, 2006 at 5:20 pm
Some guy called us “cards.” What’s that mean?
21
RT - Chief Mongress
// Dec 21, 2006 at 7:13 pm
It means you all are ACES.
22
FIAR
// Dec 21, 2006 at 7:45 pm
Blowholeroid, maybe one of these definitions fits.
http://www.urbandictionary.com.....?term=card
I dunno. I never heard of it before.
23
von
// Dec 21, 2006 at 11:27 pm
Soooo, he thinks we’re eccentric, and unique?
is that an insult, because I don’t think it is…?
24
fmragtops
// Dec 22, 2006 at 1:04 am
Maybe it’s the hip new variation of “tards”?
25 Radioactive Liberty - Useless. Worthless. Pointless. » Dead Muslim Babies, It Really IS What’s for Dinner // Jul 10, 2007 at 10:00 pm
[...] The inspiration for the post had been a big to-do over one blogger getting his hosting account suspended for merely quoting a sub-par “editorial” by FrankJ of IMAO. Denizens of rabidly stupid Leftist zombies lined up to chastise Frank’s post, and a few noticed my contribution as well. [...]
Leave a Comment or the Terrorists Win!
If you're wondering how to get an icon next to your name, go to gravatar.com and sign up for a free account.
Remember, only terrorist sympathizers don't have a gravatar.